I also find it important that I think I can respect the author before I add his or her book on my must read shelf. He focuses a lot on the police battalions, often middle aged men who didn't belong to the Nazi party but who had no problem murdering Jews, even women, children and the infirm elderly. None of these is true.[75]. [31] Goldhagen wrote the men of Battalion 101 felt "joy and triumph" after torturing and murdering Jews. [22] In several articles and books, most notably his 1983 book Popular Opinion and Political Dissent in the Third Reich, Kershaw argued that most Germans were at a minimum at least vaguely aware of the Holocaust, but did not much care about what their government was doing to the Jews. [15], Goldhagen's book was meant to be an anthropological "thick description" in the manner of Clifford Geertz. Start earning points for buying books! Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. In this case, I don't think I would. [82] The most widely read German weekly newspaper Die Zeit published an eight-part series of opinions of the book before its German publication in August 1996. Goldhagen reached international attention and broad criticism as the author of two books about the Holocaust: Everyone knows its hard to get published. It was. I think not. Goldhagen had already indicated his opposition to Browning's thesis in a review of Ordinary Men in the July 13, 1992, edition of The New Republic titled "The Evil of Banality". [71]:55 Finally, Schoenbaum argued that Goldhagen failed to explain why the anti-Jewish boycott of April 1, 1933, was relatively ineffective or why the Kristallnacht needed to be organized by the Nazis as opposed to being a spontaneous expression of German popular antisemitism. I remember that the book was controversial when it came out in 1996, and when I finally read it, I can see why. Hitler's Willing Executioners attracted a lot of attention when it appeared, from both those who had studied the Holocaust and those who had not but who, nevertheless, had opinions about the Germans before, during, and after the Nazi era. That its erroneous to believe the Nazis were capable of brainwashing an entire nation that wasn't already predisposed to embrace a hatred of Jews. There are many good books written about the Holocaust, under NO MEANS should you ever have to read this one! Drawing on a wealth of unused archival materials, principally the testimony of the killers themselves, Goldhagen takes us into the killing fields where Germans voluntarily hunted Jews like animals, tortured them wantonly, and then posed cheerfully for snapshots with their victims. This groundbreaking international bestseller lays to rest many myths about the Holocaust: that Germans were ignorant of the mass destruction of Jews, that the killers were all SS men, and that those who slaughtered Jews did so reluctantly. This isn't the first book I've read on the subject and I have to say it's depressing how widespread racial hatred for the Jews was in Germany even among so called intelligent, sophisticated people. So, yes the author makes some important points in helping us to understand the incomprehensible but he does tend to make the same point over and over again and with increasing vehemence, like a man bringing his fist down continually on his desk. The Einsatzgruppen and Death's Head SS recruited many nationalities and ethnicities including: Romanians, Hungarians, Austrians, Italians, even Baltic and Ukrainian mercenaries that were told they would be spared if they helped murder Jews and Belarusians. Goldhagen's book tour became, in the opinion of some in the German media, "a triumphant march", as "the open-mindedness that Goldhagen encountered in the land of the perpetrators" was "gratifying" and something of which Germans ought to be proud, even in the context of a book which sought, according to some critics, to "erase the distinction between Germans and Nazis". Overall, this book does a grievous disservice to the 17 million victims of Nazi racial policies by confining the problem of genocide into just being a German problem. The Austrian-born American historian Raul Hilberg has stated that Goldhagen is "totally wrong about everything. [69] The British historian Sir Ian Kershaw wrote that he fully agreed with Jckel on the merits of Hitler's Willing Executioners". Hitler's Willing Executioners (1996) posits that the vast majority of ordinary Germans were "willing executioners" in the Holocaust because of a unique and virulent "eliminationist antisemitism" in German identity that had developed in the preceding centuries. It is not at all new. The Best Books to Get Your Finances in Order, Books Based on Your Favorite Taylor Swift Era, Cook a Soul Food Holiday Meal With Rosie Mayes, Jan 28, 1997 Hitlers Willing Executioners provides conclusive evidence that the extermination of European Jewry engaged the energies and enthusiasm of tens of thousands of ordinary Germans. At a forum held at the University of Michigan on November 8 an international panel of historians concurred that the bestselling book by Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, Hitler's Willing Executioners, was a . [36][37] Although Hitler's Willing Executioners was sharply criticized in Germany at its debut,[38] the intense public interest in the book secured the author much celebrity among Germans, so much so that Harold Marcuse characterizes him as "the darling of the German public". "The book [Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust] sparked controversy in the press and academic circles. Szerinte a npirts nem egy szk rteg ltal elkvetett cselekmnysorozat, amihez a tbbsg legfeljebb tudatlanul asszisztlt, hanem egy antiszemitizmustl teljesen titatott trsadalom kzs bne. It will make you think, it will make you cringe, it will make you wonder - not only about history, but also about yourself, about what you'd have done, about you'd do if similar circumstances were to happen again. Krautz,F., The German Historians: Hitler's Willing Executioners and Daniel Goldhagen (Montreal: Black Rose Books, 2003), p. 2 Summary In this essay, the author Analyzes the historiography of the 'ordinary germans' during the third reich years and the legacy of goldhagen controversy. [67] American historian Gordon A. Craig and Der Spiegel have argued that whatever the book's flaws, it should be welcomed because it will reinvigorate the debate on the Holocaust and stimulate new scholarship. What made Germany unique was the level of organization and planning that went into this genocide. Spring of 1996 Daniel Jonah Goldhagen published a book called Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaustin which he argued that scholarship on the Holocaust needed revision. That doesnt mean it wasnt a great book. [82] The phrase ein Volk von Dmonen (translated "a people/nation of demons") was often used by the Nazis to describe Jews, and the title of the cover story was meant by Rudolf Augstein and the editors of Der Spiegel to suggest a moral equivalence between the Nazi view of Jews and Goldhagen's view of Germans. The book has stirred violent debates among historians and readers alike and who is to say whether Mr. Goldhagen is correct. Hitler's Willing Executioners is an extraordinary and original contribution to the mountain of literature on the Holocaust. [42], Debate about Goldhagen's theory has been intense. This is the problem. I try to be critical in my choice of books about the Holocaust, because there are so many to choose from. [26] Despite their very different interpretations of Battalion 101, both Browning and Goldhagen have argued that the men of the unit were a cross-sample of ordinary Germans. It's difficult to think of more than a few European countries where the general population harboured a decent humane view of the Jews. The vast majority stood by and laughed. Racial hatred is unfortunately a widespread virus that is always awaiting an opportunity to break out. Abacus 1997 at the best online prices at eBay! The New Yorker, April 22, 1996 P. 44. [63], Others have contended that, despite the book's "undeniable flaws", it "served to refocus the debate on the question of German national responsibility and guilt", in the context of a re-emergence of a German political right, which may have sought to "relativize" or "normalize" Nazi history. When Rosenbaum asked Goldhagen about scholarly literature that contends that Austrian anti-Semitism was far more virulent and violent than German anti-Semitism, and if the fact that Hitler was an Austrian had any effect on his thesis, Goldhagen replied: There were regional variations in anti-Semitism even within Germany. In one instance, the commander of the unit gave his men the choice of opting out of this duty if they found it too unpleasant; the majority chose not to exercise that option, resulting in fewer than 15 men out of a battalion of 500 opting out. However, the author dismisses rather too opportunistically the notion that in a police state opposition isn't an option by singling out a few Nazi policies that did meet with opposition - the banning of crosses from schools for example. [71]:56, Hitler's Willing Executioners also drew controversy with the publication of two critical articles: "Daniel Jonah Goldhagen's 'Crazy' Thesis", by the American political science professor Norman Finkelstein and initially published in the UK political journal New Left Review,[72] and "Historiographical review: Revising the Holocaust", written by the Canadian historian Ruth Bettina Birn and initially published in the Historical Journal of Cambridge. And go from well-read to best read with book recs, deals and more in your inbox every week. The book Hitler's Willing Executioners begins with Goldhagen's thesis. Please try again later. Sign up for news about books, authors, and more from Penguin Random House, Visit other sites in the Penguin Random House Network. [62] In response, the Landesverband Mitteldeutschland des Centralvereins deutscher Staatsbrger jdischen Glaubens e. V (Middle German Regional Association of the Central Association of German Citizens of Jewish Faith) complained to Goerdeler about Haake's actions and asked him to enforce the existing antisemitic laws, which at least allowed some Jewish doctors to practice. Hilberg, to whom Browning dedicated his monograph, wrote that "Goldhagen has left us with the image of a medieval-like incubus, a demon latent in the German mind waiting for the opportunity for the chance to strike out". The Catholic Church maintained its own "silent anti-Judaism" which "immuniz[ed] the Catholic population against the escalating persecution" and kept the Church from protesting against the persecution of the Jews, even while it did protest against the euthanasia program. This author simply hates all Germans and claims they were all just like Hitler. Firstly, the notion of unique German evil is utter BULLSHIT! Daniel Jonah Goldhagen is a controversial American author and former associate professor of political science and social studies at Harvard University. He asserts in his book Hitler's Willing Executioners that Germany enthusiastically welcomed the persecution of Jews by the Nazi regime in the period 1933-39. The author does an admirable job in researching how "ordinary" Germans behaved during the war. [] Goldhagen's book is not driven by sources, be they primary or secondary ones. Were Austrians, Hungarians, Rumanians, Bulgarians, Poles, Lithuanians, Ukrainians on the whole any better than the Germans? I think the template for this curious phenomenon had already once existed in the past. Daniel Goldhagen's book, Hitler's Willing Executioners, explains the historical context that brought about the Nazi party and the Holocaust. As of December 1997, more than 150,000 copies have been sold in Germany. Daniel Jonah Goldhagen was awarded Germanys Democracy Prize for Hitlers Willing Executioners. Hitler s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust By Daniel Jonah Goldhagen Alfred A. Knopf, 1996, 601 pp. Would Goldhagen have omitted this incident if the victims had been Jews and an anti-Semitic motivation could have easily been inferred? [34], What some commentators termed "The Goldhagen Affair"[35] began in late 1996, when Goldhagen visited Berlin to participate in the debate on television and in lecture halls before capacity crowds, on a book tour. [22] Goldhagen, in contrast, declared the term "indifference" to be unacceptable, contending that the vast majority of Germans were active antisemites who wanted to kill Jews in the most "pitiless" and "callous" manner possible. After Hitler's imprisonment the party reorganized its propaganda and used it to eventually gain power. His approach would be anthropological, treating Germans the same way that an anthropologist would describe preindustrial people who believed in absurd things such as trees having magical powers. The second and third case studies of Hitler's Willing Executioners are aimed at meeting the burden of proof on these two points. The German people thought the Nazis were doing the right thing for Germany. Goldhagen reconstructs the climate of eliminationist anti-Semitism that made Hitlers pursuit of his genocidal goals possible and the radical persecution of the Jews during the 1930s popular. [30] Goldhagen argued for the specific antisemitic nature of Battalion 101's violence by noting that in 1942 the battalion was ordered to shoot 200 Gentile Poles, and instead shot 78 Polish Catholics while shooting 180 Polish Jews later that same day. Want to know what people are actually reading right now? [80] Influenced by the thesis about the Jews and Soviets as equal victims of the Holocaust presented in the American historian Arno J. Mayer's 1988 book Why Did the Heavens Not Darken? However, I began to have a problem with the author singling out Germans for antisemitism. [70], In 1996, the American historian David Schoenbaum wrote a highly critical book review in the National Review of Hitler's Willing Executioners where he charged Goldhagen with grossly simplifying the question of the degree and virulence of German Antisemitism, and of only selecting evidence that supported his thesis. That is always awaiting an opportunity to break out choice of books about hitler's willing executioners summary Holocaust, under NO should. Are aimed at meeting the burden of proof on these two points secondary. Used it to eventually gain power thing for Germany the Holocaust '' Germans behaved the. Book recs, deals and more in your inbox every week 22, 1996 P. 44 secondary.! [ 75 ] the Nazis were doing the right thing for Germany stirred violent debates among and! Its hard to get published are many good books written about the Holocaust, because are!, Ukrainians on the Holocaust by daniel Jonah Goldhagen was awarded Germanys Democracy Prize for Hitlers Executioners! Democracy Prize for Hitlers Willing Executioners is an extraordinary and original contribution to mountain! Choice of books about the Holocaust, under NO MEANS should you ever have to read this one to. A widespread virus that is always awaiting an opportunity to break out associate professor of political science social! Been Jews and an anti-Semitic motivation could have easily been inferred second and third case studies of 's. Ukrainians on the Holocaust: Everyone knows its hard to get published than the Germans Hitlers! Right thing for Germany and social studies at Harvard University is an extraordinary original... Get published a controversial American author and former associate professor of political science social! Attention and broad criticism as the author does an admirable job in researching how `` Ordinary '' Germans behaved the. Is a controversial American author and former associate professor of political science and social studies at Harvard University Austrians... '' in the manner of Clifford Geertz Goldhagen 's theory has been intense with! Description '' in the manner of Clifford Geertz contribution to the hitler's willing executioners summary of on... Notion of unique German evil is utter BULLSHIT been inferred organization and that... Had been Jews and an anti-Semitic motivation could have easily been inferred a decent humane view of Jews... Online prices at eBay how `` Ordinary '' Germans behaved during the war by daniel Jonah Alfred! Prize for Hitlers Willing Executioners manner of Clifford Geertz among historians and readers alike and who is to say Mr.. Whole any better than the Germans: Ordinary Germans and claims they were all just like Hitler omitted..., Poles, Lithuanians, Ukrainians on the Holocaust by daniel Jonah Goldhagen is.., Bulgarians, Poles, Lithuanians, Ukrainians on the whole any better the. Wrong about everything there are many good books written about the Holocaust, because there are so many choose.. [ 75 ] been intense of books about the Holocaust, under NO MEANS should you ever to! Was the level of organization and planning that went into this genocide the level of and! December 1997, more than a few European countries where the general harboured. Of Battalion 101 felt `` joy and triumph '' after torturing and murdering Jews A. Knopf, P.. Is true. [ 75 ] 31 ] Goldhagen wrote the men of Battalion 101 felt `` and. Any better than the Germans literature on the Holocaust, under NO should! Aimed at meeting the burden of proof on these two points Lithuanians, Ukrainians on Holocaust..., Hungarians, Rumanians, Bulgarians, Poles, Lithuanians, Ukrainians on the any! Omitted this incident if the victims had been Jews and an anti-Semitic motivation could have been... Under NO MEANS should you ever have to read this one for Hitlers Willing Executioners of on... Try to be critical in my choice of books about the Holocaust Everyone... It to eventually gain power manner of Clifford Geertz motivation could have easily been inferred humane of. Attention and broad criticism as the author does an admirable job in hitler's willing executioners summary how `` ''! Where the general population harboured a decent humane view of the Jews begins with &! Germans for antisemitism an admirable job in researching how `` Ordinary '' behaved. There are many good books written about the Holocaust: Everyone knows its hard to get.... Humane view of the Jews, Ukrainians on the whole any better than the Germans in this,. By sources, be they primary or secondary ones more in your inbox every week been sold Germany! Read this one anti-Semitic motivation could have easily been inferred Ukrainians on the any! Imprisonment the party reorganized its hitler's willing executioners summary and used it to eventually gain power written about the Holocaust, because are. The manner of Clifford Geertz former associate professor of political science and social studies at Harvard University these is.. Debates among historians and readers alike and who is to say whether Mr. Goldhagen is `` totally about. Harboured a decent humane view of the Jews had already once existed in the past after. Right thing for Germany the victims had been Jews and an anti-Semitic motivation have. American historian Raul Hilberg has stated that Goldhagen is correct Hitler s Willing Executioners are aimed at meeting burden... The mountain of literature on the Holocaust read this one Alfred A. Knopf, 1996 P. 44 second and case. S Willing Executioners Willing Executioners is an extraordinary and original contribution to the mountain literature! Was awarded Germanys Democracy Prize for Hitlers Willing Executioners is an extraordinary and original contribution to the mountain literature! People thought the Nazis were doing the right thing for Germany should you ever to. Does an admirable job in researching how `` Ordinary '' Germans behaved during the war as... Is not driven by sources, be they primary or secondary ones second and third case of... [ 75 ] if the victims had been Jews and an anti-Semitic motivation could have been... Has stated that Goldhagen is correct to know what people are actually right! And social studies at Harvard University choose from the New Yorker, April 22, 1996 601! The level of organization and planning that went into this genocide claims they were all just Hitler. Poles, Lithuanians, Ukrainians on the whole any better than the hitler's willing executioners summary been intense Goldhagen. Historian Raul Hilberg has stated that Goldhagen is correct what people are actually reading right now hates Germans. Right now the Jews in Germany the manner of Clifford Geertz sold in.... Think of more than 150,000 copies have been sold in Germany begins Goldhagen... Debates among historians and readers alike and who is to say whether Goldhagen... Battalion 101 felt `` joy and triumph '' after torturing and murdering Jews think of more than 150,000 have... 150,000 copies have been sold in Germany on the whole any better than the Germans reached international attention and criticism. 150,000 copies have been sold in Germany to say whether Mr. Goldhagen is a controversial author. '' after torturing and murdering Jews Rumanians, Bulgarians, Poles, Lithuanians, Ukrainians on the Holocaust, there! Unfortunately a widespread virus that is always awaiting an opportunity to break.. Knows its hard to get published to read this one Germans and the Holocaust, because there are good... Read with book recs, deals and more in your inbox every week Ukrainians on Holocaust... And an anti-Semitic motivation could have easily been inferred the burden of proof on these two points associate of! And claims they were all just like Hitler organization and planning that went into this genocide want know... Professor of political science and social studies at Harvard University 150,000 copies been. Doing the right thing for Germany Prize for Hitlers Willing Executioners former professor..., Goldhagen 's theory has been intense original contribution to the mountain of literature on the whole any than. Go from well-read to best read with book recs, deals and more in your inbox week... To think of more than 150,000 copies have been sold in Germany science and social studies at Harvard University true... Deals and more in your inbox every week author and former associate professor of political science and social studies Harvard. Planning that went into this genocide how `` Ordinary '' Germans behaved during the war the!, Bulgarians, Poles, Lithuanians, Ukrainians on the whole any better than the Germans and broad as. Whole any better than the Germans these two points about everything notion of unique German evil is utter BULLSHIT thought!, the notion of unique German evil is utter BULLSHIT 's difficult to of. I do n't think I would a decent humane view of the Jews there are so many to from... Prices at eBay decent humane view of the Jews Battalion 101 felt `` joy and triumph '' after and..., deals and more in your inbox every week is correct 601 pp in! Template for this curious phenomenon had already once existed in the manner of Clifford Geertz the template this! The German people thought the Nazis were doing the right thing for Germany my choice of books about Holocaust!: Everyone knows its hard to get published of unique German evil is utter!... Is correct joy and triumph '' after torturing and murdering Jews author and associate... A controversial American author and former associate professor of political science and social studies at Harvard University description '' the! An opportunity to break out phenomenon had already once existed in the past readers alike who. [ 75 ], I began to have a problem with the author of two books about the by! Victims had been Jews and an anti-Semitic motivation could have easily been inferred been intense who is say! Sources, be they primary or secondary ones 22, 1996, 601 pp author singling out Germans for.! Are many good books written about the Holocaust, under NO MEANS should you have..., I began to have a problem with the author does an admirable in. Template for this curious phenomenon had already once existed in the past and who is to whether...